Bazball’s Departure from Australia in Search of Answers: Ricky Ponting
The former captain commended Zak Crawley for his impressive performance and acknowledged the durability of Pat Cummins.
As the Ashes series progressed, Australia found themselves grappling with how to counter Bazball, leaving them feeling perplexed. According to Ricky Ponting, the 2-2 final scoreline was a fair outcome. However, Ponting firmly believed that the pivotal moment came with the contentious ball change at The Oval.
The visitors took a commanding 2-0 lead, winning a nail-biting two-wicket match at Edgbaston and displaying more dominance in a convincing performance at Lord’s, withstanding Ben Stokes’ assault. However, they squandered their strong position at Headingley, allowing England to snatch victory by three wickets.
Despite two days of rain at Old Trafford, England was unable to secure a victory in the Ashes series. After scoring 592 runs at a rapid rate, their chances of winning their first series in Australia since 2001 slipped away on a dramatic final day at The Oval. A switch to a new ball revived England’s fast bowler and ultimately changed the course of the game.
“The contrasting styles of play in the match were truly captivating,” commented Ponting during an interview on the SEN Tassie breakfast show, which is co-hosted by former Australia captain Tim Paine. “There was much anticipation regarding Bazball and how England would adapt to it, and whether that style could hold its ground against the skilled Australian attack – in retrospect, it proved successful.”
The Australian players, coaches, and captain were likely perplexed at different points on how to counteract it. The 2-2 outcome, though somewhat influenced by controversy in the last Test due to the ball being changed, gave England advantageous conditions they may not have rightfully deserved. Considering the overall quality of cricket played throughout the series, a 2-2 result seems fair.
Despite only playing in three matches, Chris Woakes was awarded the Compton-Miller medal as Player of the Series for his significant impact. Mark Wood also had a notable influence after joining the team. However, Ponting emphasized that England’s sustained aggression with the bat was the crucial factor in their comeback.
“Their top-order batting was the biggest challenge for us,” he explained. “Both Crawley and Duckett consistently gave England explosive starts in every innings, which immediately put pressure on our Australian bowlers. Once that momentum started to build, it became difficult for us to regain control.”
“Zak Crawley deserves plenty of recognition for his performance in the series, especially considering the pressure he was under. His remarkable innings of 180 at Manchester showcased exceptional Test match batting skills. It left even bowlers like Pat Cummins puzzled about how to approach him.”
“The way Australia played in the game might be causing other teams to pause and evaluate their own strategies. It’s possible that even the Australian players themselves are reflecting on what they can improve upon for future matches. This style of play might serve as an example for other countries who want to compete with Australia, prompting them to consider adopting a similar approach.”
Ponting expressed support for Australia’s selection choices throughout the series and commended Cummins’ endurance in playing six matches, including the World Test Championship final against India. However, he did suggest that there might be new additions to the bowling attack in the next year.
“In the later part of the series, Cummo would most likely be the top choice once again. However, Starcy had an exceptional performance,” he stated. “There were concerns about whether Pat could maintain his intensity throughout all six Tests, and there may have been a slight dip when he faced some challenges in Manchester. But he showed impressive resilience in the last Test, delivering his fastest pace in a long time and continued to push himself.”
“Personally, as the game progressed, it seemed like they could have utilized Michael Neser in specific circumstances. However, I do believe that their selection choices were ultimately correct. We are aware of the depth we have with players like Lance Morris waiting in reserve. I think we have enough talent available and over the next year, we may see some fresh faces joining our bowling lineup.”